←Back to Cardiac Imaging

Best Cardiac Imaging Services in 2026

Heart disease remains the leading cause of death, often striking without warning symptoms. Cardiac imaging can detect arterial plaque, calcium buildup, and structural abnormalities years before a heart attack. We compared ten imaging services, from $99 coronary calcium scores to $2,500 full-body MRI scans. Each imaging modality reveals different information with varying radiation exposure, cost, and clinical utility. Some tests are widely recommended while others remain controversial among cardiologists. This guide helps you understand what each scan shows, who benefits most, and whether the results lead to interventions that actually improve outcomes.

6 Picks ReviewedUpdated Jan 2026

Quick Comparison

At-a-glance comparison of our top picks. Updated Jan 2026

RankProviderPriceBest For
1CAC Score $99 10-year CVD risk assessment (especially intermediate risk)
2Cleerly $Variable Detailed plaque characterization beyond calcium score
3Prenuvo $2499 Comprehensive cardiovascular screening without radiation
4HeartFlow $Variable Patients with suspected coronary artery disease
5Ezra $1950 Those wanting cancer and cardiac screening combined
6Fountain Life $10500 Executives wanting comprehensive cardiac evaluation

Top Picks

Detailed breakdown of each recommended option with pros, cons, and who it's best for.

1

CAC Score

Best for:10-year CVD risk assessment (especially intermediate risk)
$99
Standard test for subclinical atherosclerosis. $75-150 at imaging centers. Score of 0 is strong negative predictor.
2

Cleerly

Best for:Detailed plaque characterization beyond calcium score
$Variable
Advanced plaque analysis technology. Identifies high-risk plaque features beyond simple calcium scoring.
3

Prenuvo

Best for:Comprehensive cardiovascular screening without radiation
$2499
No radiation. Full body scan. Expensive but allows regular monitoring.
4

HeartFlow

Best for:Patients with suspected coronary artery disease
$Variable
Not preventive screening - used when CAD is suspected. Avoids unnecessary invasive procedures.
5

Ezra

Best for:Those wanting cancer and cardiac screening combined
$1950
Similar to Prenuvo but $549 less. AI screening with growing location network.
6

Fountain Life

Best for:Executives wanting comprehensive cardiac evaluation
$10500
CORE $10.5K testing only. APEX $19.5K includes ongoing support. Dallas/NYC/Orlando/Naples.

How We Chose These Picks

We evaluated cardiac imaging services on detection capabilities (what conditions can the scan identify), radiation exposure (CT scans involve ionizing radiation while MRI does not), clinical actionability (do results change treatment decisions in ways that improve outcomes), accessibility and cost (can you get the test without a referral and at reasonable cost), and evidence base (do studies show screening improves cardiovascular outcomes). We reviewed cardiology society guidelines and interviewed interventional cardiologists about which imaging they recommend for asymptomatic patients. We also considered the experience at each facility, including report quality and communication. Services that provide clinically useful information with favorable risk-benefit profiles scored highest. We penalized full-body scans that generate incidental findings causing anxiety without improving health outcomes. Pricing verified January 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's a coronary calcium score and who should get one?

A coronary calcium (CAC) score uses low-dose CT to quantify calcified plaque in heart arteries. Scores range from 0 (no detectable calcium) to 400+ (extensive calcification). CAC strongly predicts heart attack and stroke risk, often better than cholesterol numbers. Guidelines suggest considering CAC for adults 40-75 with intermediate cardiovascular risk. The scan costs $99-199, takes 10 minutes, and involves minimal radiation.

What's the difference between calcium scoring and CT angiography?

Calcium scoring shows calcified plaque only and uses very low radiation. CT angiography (CCTA) visualizes both calcified and soft plaque with detailed images of coronary arteries but uses 5-10x more radiation. CCTA is typically used for symptomatic patients or those with elevated calcium scores. For initial screening in asymptomatic people, calcium scoring offers a better risk-benefit ratio.

Are full-body MRI scans worth the cost?

Full-body MRI from companies like Prenuvo captures detailed images without radiation. For cardiac assessment specifically, dedicated cardiac MRI provides more detail than screening protocols. Full-body scans frequently find incidental abnormalities requiring follow-up, creating anxiety and medical costs. Unless you have specific risk factors or symptoms suggesting multi-system disease, targeted cardiac imaging likely provides better value.

How much radiation do cardiac CT scans involve?

A calcium score delivers approximately 1 mSv of radiation, equivalent to a few months of background radiation. CT angiography delivers 5-15 mSv depending on the protocol. For comparison, annual background radiation is about 3 mSv and a single chest X-ray is 0.1 mSv. Modern scanners and protocols minimize dose while maintaining image quality. The cancer risk from a single scan is very low.

Do cardiac imaging results change treatment?

Yes, for appropriately selected patients. A calcium score of zero in someone considering statin therapy might reasonably defer medication. A high score motivates aggressive risk factor management. CT angiography findings may lead to stress testing or catheterization. However, routine screening in low-risk individuals rarely changes management and may cause unnecessary intervention. Discuss with your doctor whether imaging results would actually change your treatment plan.

Ready to Get Started?

Compare all options and find the best fit for your health goals.

View All Cardiac Imaging Options

Important Disclaimer

This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Prices are based on January 2026 data and may vary. Consult with a healthcare provider before making health-related decisions.